Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals"
Results 61 - 80
of 105,417
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2024, 5:16 pm
An appeals court uses the Bostock ruling to usurp state law, in a new version of Roe v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
This money judgment, however, only states that a party must pay a particular sum. [read post]
11 May 2024, 7:46 am
The court rejected those arguments because it had already decided in Licavoli v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 7:42 am
As Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal explained in King v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:33 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
10 May 2024, 10:38 am
For example, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in January this year that the FBI went too far when it seized 700 safety-deposit boxes from private individuals. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
West of counsel), for respondents.Fisher, J.(1) Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Robert J. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
West of counsel), for respondents.Fisher, J.(1) Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Robert J. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Ohio v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:34 am
” People v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:27 am
See State v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
Applying the principles set out by the Supreme Court in Fish & Fish v Sea Shepherd UK[1], Meade J found the former went no further than “mere facilitation” and thus no joint liability, whereas the latter amounted to assisting customers pursuant to a common design by working a method which would have infringed EP 572. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:01 pm
In the landmark case of Yick Wo v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:23 pm
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals adopted the Ninth Circuit’s view. [read post]
9 May 2024, 3:59 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
9 May 2024, 12:38 pm
Google appealed, but both the British Columbia Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the order. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:45 am
The case is Jamie Allen Harless v. [read post]