Search for: "State v. Covington" Results 101 - 120 of 359
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
United States On 22 January 2019 the US Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up an appeal in Hassell v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 10:08 am by Guest Blogger
  In response, the State of Wyoming argued—as it had successfully below—that the dispute was squarely governed by the Court’s decision in Ward v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 5:55 am by Howard Friedman
State of Washington, (9th Cir.,, Oct. 15, 2018), the 9th Circuit held that the district court properly dismissed an inmate's 1st Amendment and RLUIPA claims regarding burning of his hair.In Ahdom v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 6:48 am by Jadzia Pierce
Covington represented Samsung in this case (White, et al. v. [read post]
Another example is a brief by former ICE and Homeland Security officials in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 5:43 am by Joe Patrice
[Law.com] * Senator Mike Lee has joined the liberals in asking nominees if they support Brown v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
China China has published Draft Regulations on the Classified Protection of Cybersecurity for public comment, a move which has been noted by Hunton Andrews Kurth and Covington & Burling. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
City of Milwaukee, a 2017 lawsuit brought by the ACLU and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP on behalf of Black and Latino people, including a military veteran, a grandmother, students, and a state legislator. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
United States, 16-9187, and Villareal-Garcia v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03262-18 Stein v The Herald, resolved by IPSO mediation 01724-18 Nightingale v Mail Online, no breach of the IPSO code 01108-18 Mike Ashley and Sports Direct v The Times, breach of provision 1 (Accuracy) 01066-18 Gabriel v The Sun, no breach of the IPSO code 01065-18 Gabriel v Daily Star, no breach of the IPSO code 01064-18… [read post]