Search for: "State v. Covington" Results 161 - 180 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:13 pm
(NFP) Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of M.M., Jerrell Covington v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At Covington’s Inside Energy & Environment blog, Thomas Brugato writes that the court’s decision Monday in Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 6:44 pm
Bankruptcy Court - Covington 08a0143n.06 Tkachik v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:19 am by Micha Nandaraj Gallo
 Its decision focused on the nature of the harm necessary for Article III standing as outlined in the United States Supreme Court’s 2016 Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:00 pm by Rafael Reyneri
  In reaching this conclusion, the court provided a cogent recounting of the FCC’s progressive expansion of the scope of the ATDS definition, which the court stated was rejected in ACA International v. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 7:53 am by Elliot Setzer
Circuit’s ruling in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
On August 1, 2022, the CJEU issued its ruling in Case 184/20 (OT v Vyriausioji tarnybinės etikos komisija) following a referral from the Lithuanian Regional Administrative Court. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-7177 Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant has already been convicted of an offense in a state criminal proceeding, the United States may thereafter prosecute the defendant for the same offense without violating the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
After last week’s decision in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm by Mary Whisner
Washington: Covington & Burling, 1976 Omnibus Copyright Revision Legislative History 17 v. [read post]