Search for: "State v. Curran"
Results 81 - 100
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2011, 12:35 pm
See generally Schweizer v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:22 pm
The ensuring case, Bruno v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:17 pm
John V. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:12 am
For more on this, see the uncited Curran v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:28 pm
(See, e.g., Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:28 pm
” (See, e.g., Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Moore Lincoln Boulevard, PO Box 249 Shawneetown, Illinois 62984-0249 Phone: 618/269-3140 Fax: 618/269-4324 Greene V. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:53 am
" In the recent case holding of Casborn v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 4:56 pm
The only one mentioned in 2010 on the useful allmediascotland.com site is the Curran case we have already discussed. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:15 pm
Bard, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:19 pm
Co., 57 AD3d 1449, 1450 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Pavia v State Farm Mut. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:26 am
Wal-Mart * CaféPress Denied 230 Motion to Dismiss--Curran v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:55 am
State Attorney General Lawsuit Exposures Covered Entities and their business associates now also need to be concerned about the potential that a state Attorney General may bring civil suit to remedy damages caused to state citizens by a breach of HIPAA. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:50 pm
The HITECH Act empowers a state attorney general to sue covered entities or business associates engaging in HIPAA violations that harms citizens of the state for statutory damages equal to the sum of the number of violations multiplied by 100 up to a maximum of $25,000 per calendar year plus attorneys fees and costs On January 13, 2010 Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal sued Health Net of Connecticut, Inc. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:08 pm
Harris v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 7:03 am
At Concurring Opinions, links are available for all articles in the most recent issue of the NYU Law Review, including a piece in which William Curran examines the Takings Clause in the context of the Court's ruling in Kelo v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:23 pm
The Struthers Industries decision comes on the heels of EBSA’s success in Solis v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 1:34 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
Scott Tooley v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
In a strongly worded order issued last week, a district judge overturned a 2008 state ruling that granted the authority permission to tap groundwater from three valleys in central Lincoln County. [read post]
