Search for: "State v. Currie" Results 201 - 220 of 457
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am by DOUGLAS MCGREGOR, BRODIES LLP
The unchallenged findings in fact of the Lord Ordinary stated that the pursuer either did not look to her left at all or failed to identify and react sensibly to the presence of the defender’s car. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has granted a Habeas Corpus petition filed by a man who was found guilty in 1993 for killing his former girlfriend, ruling that his attorney did not effectively represent him at trial.The case is Rivas v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Repercussions of law: allegations against Malaysia for cultural theft of batik, beef curry, dances, etc. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:06 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
Lord Tyre stated that this was an act of “reckless folly” which was not excused by Ms Jackson’s age (Ehrari v Curry [2007] EWCA Civ 120 distinguished). [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am by Jag
 Yesterday’s speech by Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport Sajid Javid was obviously intended to curry favour with journalists, but was filled with predictable conservative rhetoric on human rights. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am by Jag
 Yesterday’s speech by Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport Sajid Javid was obviously intended to curry favour with journalists, but was filled with predictable conservative rhetoric on human rights. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm
 DePuy argued that plaintiffs’ state law design defect claims were preempted under Pliva v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 1:19 pm by emagraken
Parties should not be unduly deterred from bringing meritorious, but uncertain, defences because they fear a punishing costs order: Currie v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
Despite “the difficulty & awkwardness of operating by force on the collective will of a State,” armed federal intervention in state affairs must be permitted.[4]During the Convention, on three different occasions, Madison tried to grant the federal government this absolute “negative” (what we now call a veto) over all state legislation. [read post]