Search for: "State v. Devine" Results 21 - 40 of 337
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:52 am by Thomas Urban
    If you have questions about filing or defending a lawsuit in Virginia state or federal courts, do not hesitate to contact Fletcher Heald attorneys. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
On 30 March 2022 there was an application in the case of Watkins -v- Mackle. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 12:14 pm by Rebecca Plevel
  She also ruled against the South Carolina State Election Commission in striking down a witness requirement for absentee voting during the height of the pandemic, in Middleton v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although the complaint alleges that Devine and Neiman induced Allen to lend money beginning in 2000, the continuing wrong doctrine (see Selkirk v State of New York, 249 AD2d 818, 819; Barash v Estate of Sperlin, 271 AD2d 558) applies such that the six-year statute of limitations “began to run from the commission of the last wrongful act” (Community Network Serv., Inc. v Verizon NY, Inc., 39 AD3d 300, 301). [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
FLASHBACK FRIDAY In an essay for The Regulatory Review, Jon Devine, director of Federal Water Policy at the Natural Resources Defense Council, and David Henkin, an attorney at Earthjustice, praised the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in County of Maui v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 1:10 pm by Andrew Hamm
These and other petitions of the week are below: Devine v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 8:08 am by Dan Bressler
” “In 2019, Reed Smith began getting anonymous correspondence that seemed like “the musings of a disgruntled person who was following” the Providence v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
  He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]