Search for: "State v. Durbin"
Results 61 - 80
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2019, 9:33 am
"Perhaps the Court can heal itself before the public demands it be 'restructured in order to reduce the influence of politics.'" By "restructured," they mean packed with new Justices by a Democratic President and Senate after they kill the filibuster.CJLF takes no position on the underlying question in the case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 11:56 am
Durbin and Illinois state officials, and see what they think. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 9:12 pm
O.L.C. __, at *6 (citing Whitman v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:26 pm
Riegel and the dreadful decision they may well make in Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:26 pm
Riegel and the dreadful decision they may well make in Wyeth v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 1:28 pm
NSSTA: Spencer v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm
When King v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:05 pm
In South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:42 pm
They are either in favor of the Durbin Amendment (Katie Porter and I are all on record about this, as is US PIRG) or on the sidelines (Consumers Union, Consumer Action, Consumer Federation of America) about this particular legislation, even though they have expressed concern over swipe fee antitrust issues previously, and clearly stated that swipe fees cause consumers to pay higher prices. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 6:42 am
In Goode v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 5:56 am
Durbin further expressed his hope that the Senate would also pass an independent bipartisan statute on crimes against humanity. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 10:36 am
United States, No. 22-800. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm
” Behind Durbin sit five of the six DACA recipients who are named plaintiffs in the McAleenan v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:47 pm
Almost 30 years ago, SCOTUS issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
In this sense, the McGovern resolution could benefit from incorporating some of the measures in the Durbin-Portman proposal in the Senate, which provide the broader scope and more flexible terms of use demanded by the present crisis. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 2:03 pm
” United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:46 am
They banter about incorporation, and whether the Second Amendment applies to the States. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:09 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Rivkin is counsel of record in Moore v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 5:45 pm
Concepcion and American Express Co. v. [read post]
