Search for: "State v. Felix"
Results 21 - 40
of 462
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
and for its discussion of Felix Frankfurter. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:23 am
This blog was co-authored by Felix Le Roux, Candidate Attorney. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:55 am
In Aponte v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Almost all states had some kind of blue-sky law by 1931. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:30 am
These cases are Johnson v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 1:01 am
He also represented Clarence Earl Gideon in what became a landmark Supreme Court case, decision Gideon v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 1:00 am
Noah Feldman is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard University where he focuses on constitutional law. [read post]
4 May 2023, 1:00 am
Noah Feldman is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard University where he focuses on constitutional law. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
The report stated that, on a specific setting, correct matches were made 89% of the time and there was no statistically significant gender or race bias. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
“Rather, the theories of the administrative state, the public interest, and the judicial process were part of the general atmosphere of thought surrounding the justices. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
This is Felix Wu’s theory of collateral censorship: good content has external benefits and is not distinguishable from bad from outside. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 9:32 am
Beauharnais v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 11:21 am
Kisor leans heavily, in its analysis, both on Chevron itself and on later opinions about the Chevron test, such as United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Victoria’s Secret v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:00 am
The history of price regulation was noted briefly by the Supreme Court in Munn v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
” F.C.C. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In caselaw, lawyers and historians can rely on new historical evidence to challenge previous rulings, as the Organization for Americans Historians did in Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 1:44 am
In 1949, federal district trial Judge Harold Medina issued criminal contempt specifications against the five lawyers representing the eleven members of the Communist Party tried and convicted of conspiracy in the case titled United States v. [read post]
