Search for: "State v. Gerard" Results 121 - 140 of 256
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2014, 3:30 am by Walter Olson
[cross-posted and expanded with a P.S. from Cato at Liberty] Even by his standards, Paul Krugman uses remarkably ugly and truculent language in challenging the good faith of those who take a view opposed to his on the case of King v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:33 pm by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
In its decision, the court in Aronow made passing reference to the case of Gerard v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
They feared it would set a disastrous higher lawmaking precedent: After all, requiring the abolition of poll taxes in federal, but not state, elections represented a relatively minor incursion on state sovereignty. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:00 pm by Gordon Firemark
Gerard Dogge (United States District Court of Nevada)   Deadmou5 trademark opposition / battle with Disney? [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:02 am
Gerard Magliocca (Panel Moderator) With the Supreme Court's grant of certiorari in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:20 am by Ben
 - And that Dogge was able to copy the work as Teller had not stated that the trick was a copyrighted work. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:05 am by Ben
 - And that Dogge was able to copy the work as Teller had not stated that the trick was a copyrighted work. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 6:47 pm by lpcprof
Judge James Mahan stated in a decision handed down March 21 that magician Gerard Dogge had infringed on magician Teller's copyright in the "Shadows" performance. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:48 pm by David Arkush
As Gerard Magliocca noted in October, he and I are the only commentators who’ve taken the position that the courts ought to defer to the Senate’s view of its own recess in NLRB v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 6:25 am by Jonathan H. Adler
” They are binding on all courts in the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
A similar dynamic occurred in the First Amendment context in 2010’s Holder v. [read post]