Search for: "State v. Gill" Results 121 - 140 of 691
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2018, 3:38 am by Lyle Denniston
Osteen, Jr., issued a separate opinion Wednesday suggesting that the Supreme Court, in its decision last term in the Wisconsin case, Gill v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:44 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
In order to rule in favor of the plaintiff states (or to accept the DOJ's concessions), the Chief Justice would have to reject his longstanding views of standing (as expressed most recently in Gill v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
Following Masih v Yousah (2014) EWCA Civ 234 (our report), it was not enough for the notice to state rent due at the time of service to rescue the omission. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Federalist Society Review, Richard Raile argues that last term’s decision in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:56 am by Andrew Hamm
Writing for The Washington Post’s Monkey Cage blog, Bernard Grofman parses last term’s partisan-gerrymandering decisions in Gill v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:52 am by Edward Foley
The plaintiffs, including in the recent fizzle of this term’s Gill v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
Valentin Vandendaele at Leiden Law Blog describes – and advocates – use of the efficiency gap to measure partisan gerrymandering, which the court declined to do this term in Gill v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:58 pm by Samuel Bray
Finally, too little attention has been paid to the implications for the national injunction of a case decided last week: Gill v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Colorado Civil Rights Commission and a partisan-gerrymandering case from North Carolina back for reconsideration in light of Gill v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:38 am by Erin McCarthy Holliday
Common Cause [docket] and sent the North Carolina partisan gerrymandering case back to the lower court for further consideration in light of its recent decision in Gill v. [read post]