Search for: "State v. Goebel" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2011, 9:49 pm by Dan Ernst
Meanwhile, Goebel's seminar continued to study the development of the corporation in England and the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 5:21 pm
Google Scholar did find the cases, as the fifth and ninth items, but check out item four: State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:35 am by MBettman
The mortgage stated that the loan was insured by the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”). [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 10:31 am
" In the Matter of B.M.G. and L.G., and John Goebel v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
(For purposes of our discussion, we will set aside the question whether, under United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 3:15 am
On the Daubert issue, the only one on which the Court reverses the Nacchio verdict, it ironically relies on a case (Goebel v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 3:54 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has oral arguments scheduled in Cincinnati, Ohio for the two weeks of March 5, 2007 thru March 16, 2007 Some Kentucky cases are: March 5, 2007    4  06-5619    Bouggess v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]