Search for: "State v. Hale"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,073
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2007, 4:20 pm
For publication opinions today (1): In Michael Hale v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm
His application was rejected, but he made a fresh application which is not yet determined (and the approach of UKBA may have been changed by HJ Iran v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] 3 WLR 386.) [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm
His application was rejected, but he made a fresh application which is not yet determined (and the approach of UKBA may have been changed by HJ Iran v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] 3 WLR 386.) [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 7:06 am
LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
The lead judgment was given by Lady Hale, with Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Reed unanimously agreeing with her findings. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:39 am
Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath give a short joint judgment concurring with the majority in relation to the Secretary of State’s appeal but dissenting on the cross appeal. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
At the end of the hearing, perturbed by the respondents’ tough predicament, Lady Hale characterised these proceedings as an “anxious case”. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:07 pm
In Walden v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 7:57 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 12:38 pm
In Price v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 10:40 pm
This post concerns a similar case to the Hale v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
Lady Hale provided a supporting judgment in which she emphasised the importance of the law being seen as fair, consistent and logical. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
Lady Hale provided a supporting judgment in which she emphasised the importance of the law being seen as fair, consistent and logical. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am
The appellant was named and the case name is now Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:05 am
R (Reilly & Anor) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 29 July 2013. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:10 am
Therefore, agreeing with the Government’s reasoning, Lady Hale held that: It follows that the decisions of the Court of Appeal in Akhtar and Bibi must be overruled and that this appeal must be allowed by consent in terms of the detailed order proposed. [read post]
11 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:59 am
Hoffman v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 9:14 am
In particular, treaty obligations cease to apply to a territory where it secedes from the state which entered into the treaty, or for example where a formerly dependent territory becomes independent from the parent state which entered into the treaty. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm
Br. 35–36, but neither did they leave each State wholly free to hale other States before its courts, contra Br. in Opp. [read post]
