Search for: "State v. Hansard"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2024, 9:42 am
You can read the Hansard here. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 5:35 am
[v] The Bill could therefore be introduced as soon as May 2022, although much of the detail is yet to be revealed. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
In Allard v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 10:54 am
Reg. 4685 (Jan. 21, 2009). [6] See Burka v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:17 pm
As Lord Wakeham noted during the debates on the Bill in 1998, section 32 “enshrines the pre-eminence of freedom of expression” (Hansard, HL, 2 Feb 1998). [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am
The full Hansard text is here. (19 July 2014). [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 5:34 am
Academies: Freedom of Information, House of Commons Hansard, Parliamentary Written Question – 16 Sep 2010 “Philip Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Education for what reasons academies are not subject to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. [8620] Jake Berry: To ask the Secretary of State for Education whether he plans to make academy schools subject to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. [11456] Mr Gibb:… [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Existing democracies are fragile.[3] That includes the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 11:15 am
”); see United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
In particular, an SCC judge commented that they had looked at the second reading of Hansard and committee debates for indication of legislative intent. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:38 am
In reaching this view, Mr Justice Knowles referred to Hansard – admissible in these proceedings given the ambiguity of the primary legislation – which recorded that during a debate in the House of Lords on 24 October 2000, Lord Falconer of Thoroton stated that the words “or dignity” were proposed to be added to paragraph 3(b) by amendment to ensure “that the exemption applies to the granting of peerages”. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 7:20 am
In last week’s case (Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
I will begin by summarising the present state of that law. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm
Supreme Court has granted certiorari to hear a major case on the right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm
I will begin by summarising the present state of that law. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
The Hansard report of the debate can be found here. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am
In Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Limited (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109 Lord Keith stated that “the right to personal privacy is clearly one in which the law in this field should seek to protect. [read post]
