Search for: "State v. Harding"
Results 21 - 40
of 17,964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Lucykanish v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:04 pm
After an unsuccessful direct appeal, United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:16 am
Court of Federal Claims’ 2023 determination in Myriddian, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:49 am
There have been some striking rulings cutting back on agency power, such as West Virginia v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:05 pm
I attended oral arguments in the case Snyder v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:52 am
But it is hard to distinguish the rationale under 28 USC § 2401(a). [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 11:04 pm
The Supreme Court decision is Sheetz v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:11 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:00 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Being a Catholic politician could be hard, he noted, in a pluralistic society like the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:06 am
In Lindke v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:10 am
In State of Texas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In last year's landmark affirmative action case, SFFA v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 2:07 pm
Such is the case in Ninestar Corporation et al. v. [read post]
