Search for: "State v. Harrington"
Results 161 - 180
of 451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2015, 6:01 pm
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Merger of first-degree assault and reckless endangerment After a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Selwyn Harrington, appellant, was convicted of first and second-degree assault and reckless endangerment. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:10 pm
Contents include:Metal-Tech Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 6:40 am
Harrington. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:47 pm
" (Page 12, quoting Harrington v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:20 am
Although it had long "'look[ed] through' summary decisions by state appellate courts," the Eleventh Circuit believed that a recent decision of this Court--Harrington v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Hittson asks, among other things, “[w]hether the Eleventh Circuit has correctly determined that this Court’s decision in Harrington v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:44 am
” [Flint River Steamboat Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 4:00 am
In the recent decision of Casella Wines PTY Limited v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:07 am
Tuesday’s argument in McFadden v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 11:46 am
Harrington, 562 U.S. at 101 (“Strickland does not establish that a cursory investigation automatically justifies a tactical decision.... [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 1:53 pm
The court applied the AEDPA limitation on relief as described in Harrington v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
I went back 99 years to Haas v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
Second, and in any event, the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Harrington v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Washington under Section 2254(d)(1); and (3) whether the lower court misapplied Harrington v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 1:02 pm
Judge Kozinski disagreed with this reading of the PCR order, and argued that under Harrington v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:42 pm
Neither is it open for anyone to do so either: Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11, at 72, per Heydon, Crennan, Bell JJ; and indeed, had the transcript been different than the transcript provided by the official transcriber, it would constitute a serious offence as an officer of the court. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:50 am
In Travelers Commercial Insurance Co. v. [read post]
