Search for: "State v. Hauge"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am
March v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am
March v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
As a question of substantial evidence was raised by Petitioner, the proceeding was transferred to the Appellate Division.Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division noted that the Court of Appeals had recently reviewed the principles governing judicial review of administrative determinations under the substantial evidence standard and noted that, as relevant in this action, the high court had emphasized that "the… [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
As a question of substantial evidence was raised by Petitioner, the proceeding was transferred to the Appellate Division.Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division noted that the Court of Appeals had recently reviewed the principles governing judicial review of administrative determinations under the substantial evidence standard and noted that, as relevant in this action, the high court had emphasized that "the… [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:04 am
The New York Court of Appeals holds that hearsay evidence was enough to support an adverse finding against the male student.The case is In the Matter of Haug v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:18 am
By Dennis Crouch Bowman v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 2:18 am
There are a host of issues in DSG Evergreen v Town of Perry, No. 2009AP727 (Wis. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
They are David Monson, a Republican member of the state legislature; and Wayne Hauge, who is a farmer, accountant, and non-smoker. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:39 pm
Hauge is an Associate in the Gibbons Real Property & Environmental Department. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:02 am
The court’s decision in Lakeside Manor v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 11:30 pm
Haug's advice. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
Daubert v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:38 am
In its published opinion in State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
For example the Appellate Division has held that the fact that a decedent registered to vote in a particular state does not mean that the decedent made that state his or her domicile (see Laufer v Hauge, 140 AD2d 671 [2d Dept 1988]; Matter of Estate of Gadway, 133 AD2d 83 [3d Dept 1987]). [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:48 am
Notably, Judge Newman dissented, stating that “failure to adhere closely to ba [read post]
22 May 2023, 11:52 am
ET: The Atlantic Council will host a fireside chat with the European Commissioner for Transport Adina Vӑlean. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the court opined that when reviewing an administrative determination rendered after a hearing that is required by law, the court's standard is whether the determination "is, on the entire record, supported by substantial evidence" which is a "minimal standard ... demand[ing] only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
