Search for: "State v. Henderson"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,079
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
CPR 3.1(7) states that “A power of the court under these Rules to make an order includes a power to vary or revoke the order”. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 6:48 am
Henderson discovered 4 additional skimmers at 4 separate gas pumps at this Valero gas station. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:30 pm
Code § 3553(c), a sentencing court must state `the reasons for its imposition of the particular sentence. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 1:05 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 1:05 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 9:07 am
Judge Sri Srinivasan, writing for a three judge panel in Simon v. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am
That was the difficult question the Supreme Court had to grapple with in the case of R(C) v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:09 am
As IPKat readers will remember, there are two cases currently pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), ie GS Media [here] and Filmspeler, which will require everybody’s favourite court to address this very issue [here and here tables summarising the state of the art regarding linking in Europe at the moment].In the meantime, Katfriend and IP enthusiast Nedim Malovic (Stockholm University) has provided a recap of what has happened since… [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am
Yesterday the Court announced that it had granted review in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 9:21 am
Cash & Henderson Drugs, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:09 am
On December 28, the Justice Department filed an amicus brief in Weinstein v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am
In Maling v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am
In Maling v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am
In Maling v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 8:59 am
(Id. at 14-15) (citing United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
International Trade Secret and Non-Compete Law Update In the third installment, attorneys Wan Li, Ming Henderson and Daniel Hart focused on non-compete and trade secret considerations from an international perspective. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 3:58 am
In delivering the leading judgment, Lord Neuberger stated that the effect of Henderson J’s “unless” order, coupled with Hildyard J’s finding that the appellants had failed to comply with the disclosure requirements in that order, was that the appellants were debarred from defending the claim unless they were granted relief from sanctions under CPR 3.9. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:22 am
In People v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 1:53 pm
In early November, a sharply divided Illinois Supreme Court cleared the way for claims against the developer and contractor involved in a now 19-year-old condominium development, narrowly affirming the Appellate Court decision in Henderson Square Condominium Association v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 11:02 am
Co., 715 P.2d 389 (Kan. 1986) and Henderson v. [read post]
