Search for: "State v. Higgins" Results 201 - 220 of 349
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm by Mark Zamora
Wiggins, 113 Ga. 842, 850 (1901); Higgins v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am by Yvonne Daly
This decision, Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 (discussed here), found that s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, which had been in operation for the past 36 years having been inserted by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976, was contrary to the Constitution. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:40 am by Schachtman
  With all the briefing in the federal MDL, the New York state cases, and the securities fraud class action, hundreds of pages were written on the suspected flaws in meta-analyses. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 12:09 am by Vikram Raghavan
Whilst state practice can be found in support (see Filártiga v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:44 am by S
If the intention is to speed up the eviction process rather than to increase evictions it is not at all clear why the court's discretion to suspend or postpone the eviction has not been retained in circumstances where there is persuasive evidence that the tenant's behaviour will improve, i.e. the only circumstances in which a court should suspend or postpone a possession order under the current discretionary ground (see Manchester City Council v Higgins [2005] EWCA Civ… [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:44 am by S
If the intention is to speed up the eviction process rather than to increase evictions it is not at all clear why the court's discretion to suspend or postpone the eviction has not been retained in circumstances where there is persuasive evidence that the tenant's behaviour will improve, i.e. the only circumstances in which a court should suspend or postpone a possession order under the current discretionary ground (see Manchester City Council v Higgins [2005] EWCA Civ… [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:32 pm
Surely this is so in Israel, whose Supreme Court pronounced on targeted killings in Public Committee against Torture in Israel (2006), and in the United States, whose Supreme Court held in Hamdan v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm by Lawrence Higgins
But even if it's just treated as symbolic expression, it is still constitutionally protected, as cases such as Texas v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:13 am by New Books Script
KF 250 H54 2011 Successful legal writing / Edwina Higgins, Laura Tatham. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
On Thursday, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals decided Viacom v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:34 am by Brady Iandiorio
The following is an analysis of an order regarding summary judgment in American States Insurance Company v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:20 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
Johnson & Higgins, Inc., 91 F.3d 1529, 1534 (2d Cir. 1996). [read post]