Search for: "State v. Hobby" Results 81 - 100 of 919
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2017, 11:00 am by Eugene Volokh
It can’t tell courts how to decide cases (again, absent a change in the substantive law on which the case is based), see United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:31 am by Andrew M. Ironside
The title of this post comes from this recent essay by Professor Ellen Katz, the abstract of which states: This Essay explores a distinct way Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:28 am by Joy Waltemath
The U.S. government has requested that the Supreme Court hear the case of Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v Sebelius, in which the craft store (along with another chain owned by the family) requested an exemption from the Affordable Care Act mandate to provide contraceptive coverage to its employees on the basis of religious objection by the owners. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am by Marty Lederman
  (See, e.g., paragraph 109 of the Hobby Lobby complaint, and paragraphs 30 and 92 of the Conestoga Wood complaint.)In medical and scientific circles, pr [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:17 am
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and from the 3d Cir., Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]