Search for: "State v. Hoffmann"
Results 121 - 140
of 296
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
Like many of this weblog's readers, this Kat has long nurtured a fascination and deep admiration for the United States Federal judiciary. [read post]
6 May 2013, 2:23 pm
(citing Kendall v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
Since 2002 there had been extensive litigation in Canada and the United States arising from a contractual dispute between the two groups. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 7:31 am
However, the case is certain to prove to be a key FLSA precedent, the first since the Supreme Court’s 1989 ruling in Hoffmann-LaRoche v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 7:39 am
By a tight five-to-four decision, the United States Supreme Court's Genesis Health Care Corp. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 7:39 am
By a tight five-to-four decision, the United States Supreme Court's Genesis Health Care Corp. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc., 2013 WL 1191899 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm
In English law the “conventional figures” are much higher than in, say, France but much lower than in the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
Lord Hoffmann: notso easy to replace ... [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:03 pm
In true anecdotal style, the author explains the relevance of Section 115 of the Indian statute (appointment of scientific advisors) by pointing out the open expression of gratitude by Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:01 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Holding AG engaged in biotechnology research. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm
However, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal [2006] UKHL 44 he was described by Lord Hoffmann as being “hostile to the spirit of Reynolds” and his finding in favour of the Saudi Arabian businessman was reversed, the House of Lords finding that qualified privilege did apply. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
An appellate court should, as Lord Hoffmann explained in Biogen v Medeva [1997] RPC 1, be very cautious in differing from a judge's evaluation unless it can be shown that the judge erred in principle or reached a perverse conclusion. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
As a result he referred a number of questions to the CJEU.Parallel importation In Advocate General Jacobs opinion in Joined Cases C-143/00 and C-443/99 Boehringer Ingelheim KG & Ors v Swingward Ltd & Ors [2003] Ch 27 (Boehringer I) he stated that the notice requirement in Condition 5 dated from the Hoffmann-La Roche & Co AG v Centrafarm Bertriebsgesellschaft Pharmazeutischer Erezeugnisse mBH [1978] ECHR 1139 where that Court explained that the… [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am
Thomas Koch of Hoffmann Eitle, noted. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:09 pm
and Lord Hoffmann, commenting on the decision in Bieber, observed that Article 3 was prescribing the minimum standard, not a norm. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:41 am
The United States analogue is Griswold v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:54 am
Judge Birss took the opportunity of the question session to explain that in certain cases, where the parties agree, he may be prepared to give preliminary views on the case during a Case Management Conference and/or deal with cases on paper (as was done in Hoffmann v DARE). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:38 pm
HHJ Birss QC took the opportunity of the question session to explain that in certain cases, where the parties agree, he may be prepared to give preliminary views on the case during a Case Management Conference and/or deal with cases on paper (as was done in Hoffmann v DARE). [read post]
