Search for: "State v. Holland Plastics Co."
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:40 am
Fourteen of the loans called for a stated interest amount; the other three did not call for any interest. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983). [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
Case New Holland, Inc., 566 F.3d 1372, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Holland 1916 Inc., failed to file disclosure reports with federal and state agencies for three years, according to a consent agreement with the Environmental Protectio [read post]
