Search for: "State v. Hollingsworth"
Results 301 - 320
of 372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2013, 8:49 am
In the second part of a two-part series at Verdict, Vikram Amar considers some of the potential legal scenarios that could occur in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:55 pm
The Court in that case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
” Lawrence v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 7:16 am
Of the two, one would prefer to cover United States v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:30 am
Schwarzenegger (now Hollingsworth v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
(Alito, J., recused) Hollingsworth v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 2:21 pm
Perry and United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:27 pm
In Patterson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 11:38 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:18 pm
(citing Windsor v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
United States (appeals court applying heightened scrutiny only) A fifth case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
United States (appeals court applying heightened scrutiny only) A fifth case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 4:20 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The proposed lines dividing each of the six new states are provisional; under Draper’s proposal, over the next few years, any county that adjoins any of the proposed states can choose to become part of that contiguous state, provided that the counties that are provisionally in that neighboring state also agree to add such a county. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:06 pm
(Jewell's Lessee v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:34 am
Fourth, if an individual is subject to a new order of a state regulator, then an alert is sent out to all other state regulators as well as FINRA through the CRD. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
Coogan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
His dissent ten years later in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
