Search for: "State v. Hoopes"
Results 241 - 260
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
The threats are everywhere: Congress, state legislatures, the Supreme Court, internationally. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:30 am
In the 1986 case Waliga v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:14 am
Swatch Group Management Services Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 3:58 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:24 pm
The fact that Mr Gopee and his associated companies are required to go through the hoops of issuing proceedings against HM Land Registry to satisfy the court that their loans or acquisitions are not yet another example of an appalling breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 cannot possibly in all the past circumstances be regarded as a breach of their human rights. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The Constitution Bench of this Court in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and Others v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
Prior to the release of Murphy’s letter, GSA stated, “An ascertainment has not yet been made. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
Carr, the state’s attorney general, made a remarkable argument. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 8:00 pm
Bullock v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:33 am
The IPKat was pacing up and down this morning, impatiently awaiting the Advocate General's Opinion in Case C-32/08 Fundación Española para la Innovación de la ArtesanÃÂa (FEIA) v Cul de Sac Espacio Creativo, S.L. and Acierta Product & Position, S.A., a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil Número Uno, Alicante, Spain,… [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
In a 2004 case, Cochran v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:13 am
v=h-8PBx7isoM Almost 14 million views! [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 1:54 pm
Both cases, Woznicki v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:35 pm
This exception can swallow the entirety of New York state. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:47 am
Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH has already attracted a lot of attention, not least because some good souls have rather forgotten that, while the Advocate General is a member of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and his rulings, always influential, are adopted by the CJEU in an estimated 75-80% of intellectual property cases, his Opinions are not actually the rulings of the court. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:15 pm
Courts were not only accepting, but legitimating, problematic forensic science or research by allowing it to pass through procedural hoops and make it out the other side. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 7:05 am
What are those hoops and how do you jump through them? [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
The panel also ruled that an improper motive for a challenge by one attorney out of several in a multi-defendant case can be enough to violate the principle of Batson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:31 pm
Scalia’s Dissent in PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:00 am
In Hill v. [read post]
