Search for: "State v. Hopkins" Results 181 - 200 of 806
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2012, 11:27 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
’” Johns Hopkins Univ. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Dayton, University of Connecticut, and Sharon V. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 10:44 am by Caroline Gentry
Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989), which “held that the practice of gender stereotyping falls within Title VII’s prohibition against sex discrimination,” and Oncale v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 1:20 pm by ---------------------------------
In its decision, released on March 22, 2011, the Montana Supreme Court upheld a ruling by the Workers’ Compensation Court (WCC) which found that a man who was mauled while feeding the bears for his employer may collect workers’ compensation even though he smoked pot beforehand.The case, Hopkins v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 9:56 am by Heather S. Klein
Hopkins nearly thirty years ago was actionable under Title VII—and sexual orientation. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
Finally, he requests that he be resentenced pursuant to the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:03 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The cases in which permission has been granted are as follows: R (Bancoult No 3) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd & Anor; Richborough Estates Partnership LLP & Anor Cheshire East Borough Council R (Cardiff & Vale University Board & Ors) v Ceredigion County Council & Ors Miller & Ors v Ministry of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm by INFORRM
” [55] In Blake v Fox [2023] EWCA Civ 1000, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against Justice Nicklin’s meaning judgment for five out of six tweets. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:28 am by Will Baude
Finally, there is an amicus brief from the Liberty Justice Center that relies heavily on a 1935 case called Hopkins Federal Savings and Loan v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court ruled 5-4 in Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]