Search for: "State v. Ingalls" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2024, 12:09 pm by David Kessler (US) and Susan Ross (US)
         With respect to comprehensive state privacy laws, on December 31, 2023, the number of U.S. states with such laws increased to five (adding to California, Colorado, Connecticut, and Virginia) with which state’s law going into effect a. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
” (Wolfe v Shawcor Ltd, 2016 ABQB 261) “It seems to me at this point this is somewhat parallel to the Pythonesque description of a particular parrot” (Karl Hermanns v. [read post]
Huntington Ingalls, Inc., the court—again constrained by Bartel—stated that “a revised approach may have merit. [read post]
Huntington Ingalls, Inc., the court—again constrained by Bartel—stated that “a revised approach may have merit. [read post]
17 May 2019, 12:33 pm by Scott Seiler and Liskow & Lewis
Huntington Ingalls, Inc., the court—again constrained by Bartel—stated that “a revised approach may have merit. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
The Supreme Court chose to refer this question to the CJEU, which replied in a decision of the 26 February 2015 (C-41/14 – Christie’s France SNC v Syndicat national des antiquaries, see previous post here). [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 5:37 am by Jon L. Gelman
Because we find a duty does indeed lie to such persons in the recognizable and foreseeable area of risk, we answer the certified question, as restated, in the affirmative.Quisenberry v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm by Schachtman
Huntington Ingalls Inc., 817 F.3d 1170, 1177 (9th Cir. 2016); Lindstrom v. [read post]