Search for: "State v. International Amusements"
Results 81 - 100
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2022, 9:55 am
Shortly before the hearing the European Court of Justice held in mid-July, I discussed how the EC's Directorate-General for Competition (DG COMP) might be able to defend its International Skating Union decision (which was affirmed by the EU General Court, but appealed further to the ECJ) while supporting the European Sports Model in European Superleague Company v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(IP Dragon) Copycats in China: trains, planes and ... automobiles (IP Dragon) Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules Innocent Pictures ApS’ use of ‘Tivoli’ and ‘Tivoli Night’ in context of pornographic broadcasts infringes trade mark rights of Danish amusement park TIVOLI A/S (Class 46) Court finds minimal confusion in MINIMAL case (International Law Office) Europe ECJ: Promotional items do not… [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 10:58 am
Emoji were also in the limelight in a case before the State Labor Court of Baden-Württemberg. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 5:57 pm
McDermott – that case later became United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
The same issue was raised in Board of Directors of Rotary International v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 2:08 am
Sporte Leisure Pty Ltd v Paul’s International Pty Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 1162 [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Wireless states on web page that their “intellectual property portfolio contains numerous pending and issued domestic and international patents (over 1600 patent claims issued, allowed and pending) related to a variety of wireless and web-based messaging technologies. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Wireless states on web page that their “intellectual property portfolio contains numerous pending and issued domestic and international patents (over 1600 patent claims issued, allowed and pending) related to a variety of wireless and web-based messaging technologies. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:54 am
International Business Machines Corporation, et. al. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:45 pm
State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:33 am
Dec. 12, 2016) (Statement of Interest)) and through consent decrees (see Nat’l Fed. of the Blind and United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Oral arguments in Hatim v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
Kristin Nedialkova v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:14 am
In another case, even though an employee never reported sexually harassing comments by her female manager on her body (including her breasts), she survived summary judgment on her claim that the comments were part of a sexually hostile environment (Sell v BC International Group, WDPa, May 16, 2013). [read post]
14 May 2022, 1:51 am
Techs., LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:11 am
The accused was then charged with having breached the Small Birds Act, s.2 of which states:2. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm
The Court was not amused or assuaged by the plaintiffs’ assurances. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:29 am
The court declined to exercise jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claim under the New York Labor Law, which was unaffected by the FLSA exemption that sent the plaintiff’s federal claims into foul territory (Chen v Major League Baseball, March 26, 2014, Koeltl, J). [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm
But Kansas law has rejected this principle as a matter of state law, see Gobin v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:08 pm
Bell (1927) and Skinner v. [read post]
