Search for: "State v. International Amusements" Results 81 - 100 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2022, 9:55 am by Florian Mueller
Shortly before the hearing the European Court of Justice held in mid-July, I discussed how the EC's Directorate-General for Competition (DG COMP) might be able to defend its International Skating Union decision (which was affirmed by the EU General Court, but appealed further to the ECJ) while supporting the European Sports Model in European Superleague Company v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(IP Dragon) Copycats in China: trains, planes and ... automobiles (IP Dragon)   Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules Innocent Pictures ApS’ use of ‘Tivoli’ and ‘Tivoli Night’ in context of pornographic broadcasts infringes trade mark rights of Danish amusement park TIVOLI A/S (Class 46) Court finds minimal confusion in MINIMAL case (International Law Office)   Europe ECJ: Promotional items do not… [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 10:58 am by Eric Goldman
Emoji were also in the limelight in a case before the State Labor Court of Baden-Württemberg. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 5:57 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
McDermott – that case later became United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 2:08 am by war
Sporte Leisure Pty Ltd v Paul’s International Pty Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 1162 [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
  Wireless states on web page that their “intellectual property portfolio contains numerous pending and issued domestic and international patents (over 1600 patent claims issued, allowed and pending) related to a variety of wireless and web-based messaging technologies. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
  Wireless states on web page that their “intellectual property portfolio contains numerous pending and issued domestic and international patents (over 1600 patent claims issued, allowed and pending) related to a variety of wireless and web-based messaging technologies. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:33 am by Ad Law Defense
Dec. 12, 2016) (Statement of Interest)) and through consent decrees (see Nat’l Fed. of the Blind and United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:14 am by Lorene Park
In another case, even though an employee never reported sexually harassing comments by her female manager on her body (including her breasts), she survived summary judgment on her claim that the comments were part of a sexually hostile environment (Sell v BC International Group, WDPa, May 16, 2013). [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:11 am
The accused was then charged with having breached the Small Birds Act, s.2 of which states:2. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm by Schachtman
The Court was not amused or assuaged by the plaintiffs’ assurances. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:29 am by Joy Waltemath
The court declined to exercise jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claim under the New York Labor Law, which was unaffected by the FLSA exemption that sent the plaintiff’s federal claims into foul territory (Chen v Major League Baseball, March 26, 2014, Koeltl, J). [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
But Kansas law has rejected this principle as a matter of state law, see Gobin v. [read post]