Search for: "State v. JS"
Results 41 - 60
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2022, 9:09 am
BL * High School Can’t Expel Student for Sharing Memes in Private Snapchat Conversation–JS v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 4:53 pm
The Supreme Court of Pakistan has cited Rajendra Singh Rana v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:33 am
Caglayan Orge Saylan v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 9:24 am
Co v Cirucci, 46 NY2d 862, 864 [1979]; City of Kingston v Harco Nat. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:21 pm
Comments In the Grand Chamber judgment in Guja v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
The benefit cap JR got lost amongst that other stuff partly because it was almost predictable after MA that the Divisional Court would find a way to uphold it.Actually, though, having read it again the other day for a different reason, the benefit cap challenge – R(JS) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) – was very clever (CPAG and Shelter were joined as interveners – CPAG’s arguments can be found here) and the appeal is to be heard pretty soon, having… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
The benefit cap JR got lost amongst that other stuff partly because it was almost predictable after MA that the Divisional Court would find a way to uphold it.Actually, though, having read it again the other day for a different reason, the benefit cap challenge – R(JS) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) – was very clever (CPAG and Shelter were joined as interveners – CPAG’s arguments can be found here) and the appeal is to be heard pretty soon, having… [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 9:49 am
BL * High School Can’t Expel Student for Sharing Memes in Private Snapchat Conversation–JS v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm
People v Scott, Michigan Dept of State Police v Sitz, Indianapolis v Edmond, People v Jackson and People v Trotter settled that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Langfan v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
In finding that the mark consisted of the shape that gave the product substantial value, the CJEU stated that this concept was not limited to the shape of products having only artistic or ornamental value and that it also covered products with “essential functional characteristics”. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 5:00 pm
Click to read full article [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:00 pm
Click to read full article [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 1:02 pm
Lessons and Takeaways from the Kanye v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 8:10 am
Q: West Virginia v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:31 am
P. 56 in Celotex Corp. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 7:54 am
The acceptance-of-benefits doctrine states that a party cannot treat a judgment as both right and wrong. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
Kim Kardashian v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:36 pm
The best interests of children are a primary consideration: see, for example, R (JS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) per Elias LJ at paras 42 to 46. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:36 pm
The best interests of children are a primary consideration: see, for example, R (JS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) per Elias LJ at paras 42 to 46. [read post]
