Search for: "State v. Jean" Results 81 - 100 of 1,111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
  Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito yesterday called the leak of his draft opinion overturning Roe v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
  In response to the debate the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Gareth Johnson) told the House that these matters would be dealt with in legislation which, he said, was being drafted. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 8:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Jean Alexander Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Ladislav Zdút v EUIPO concerned a trademark for a figurative mark for the brand "NEHERA" (EUTM 11794112), which was applied for and registered in 2013-2014, including a number of different types of goods such as clothing and footwear. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Ladislav Zdút v EUIPO concerned a trademark for a figurative mark for the brand "NEHERA" (EUTM 11794112), which was applied for and registered in 2013-2014, including a number of different types of goods such as clothing and footwear. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:30 am by jonathanturley
Indeed, it almost had that High Chancellor Adam Sutler look from V for Vendetta. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 3:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here's the full context, from White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre yesterday: Q But specifically with regards to limiting these freedoms — I guess my question is: The Supreme Court created this space for the anti-abortion movement at the state level and also perhaps at the federal level to try and restrict this freedom. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Where, as here, the defendants submitted evidentiary material in support of that branch of their cross motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint, the criterion becomes whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether one is stated (see Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 845). [read post]