Search for: "State v. Kingston" Results 41 - 60 of 196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Like the original Brookings report, I collected data on sextortion occurring both within and outside of the United States. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 4:45 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Kingston Technologies Co., No. 16-cv-00300, 2017 WL 3275615 (C.D. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:27 am by Dave
  In other words, the question was whether the judgment of Gage LJ in Tetteh v Kingston Upon Thames Royal London Borough Council [2004] EWCA Civ 1775 survived Hotak; ie that it remained correct in asserting that a review decision had to be read as a whole and that there was no reason for the reviewer to go further than stating the test and the overall finding. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am by INFORRM
The decision in Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) clarifies the application of the statutory defence of honest opinion under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:51 am by Amanda Pickens
October 13, 2017) (purported collective and class action brought under federal and state wage and hour laws by employees of defendant who were “home health aides” and also performed related activities for defendant in Kingston, North Carolina who allege they were not paid correct overtime premium rate compensation.) [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:35 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In the 2011 matter Kingston (City) v Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 109, Arbitrator Elaine Newman noted the following with respect to Bill 168: “The Bill 168 amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Act have changed the law of the workplace in a significant way….The theory is that workplace violence is usually foreshadowed. [read post]