Search for: "State v. Konigsberg"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:32 am
"); State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Konigsberg v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
Matter of Puig v New York State Police 2023 NY Slip Op 00258 Decided on January 19, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
Matter of Puig v New York State Police 2023 NY Slip Op 00258 Decided on January 19, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 75 (1964) (defamation); Konigsberg v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
State, 281 Cal. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Addressing yet another aspect of Appeal 1, the Appellate Division, citing Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, opined that "Contrary to [Plaintiff's] further contention in appeal No. 1, [Supreme Court] did not err in remitting the matter to [Respondents] to reconsider [Plaintiff's] request, provide a privilege log, and ultimately comply with its statutory obligations and thus any decision concerning Plaintiff's entitlement to attorney's fees are premature at… [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Addressing yet another aspect of Appeal 1, the Appellate Division, citing Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, opined that "Contrary to [Plaintiff's] further contention in appeal No. 1, [Supreme Court] did not err in remitting the matter to [Respondents] to reconsider [Plaintiff's] request, provide a privilege log, and ultimately comply with its statutory obligations and thus any decision concerning Plaintiff's entitlement to attorney's fees are premature at… [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:00 pm
[1] Citing LNYC Loft, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
Identification of the records demanded.Noting that Kirsch and Starvaggi had "reasonably described" the requested emails thus enabling the Board to identify and produce the records, the Appellate Division, citing Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, held that the Board "cannot evade the broad disclosure provisions of [the] statute . . . upon the naked allegation that the request will require review of thousands of records. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 6:12 am
The New York Appellate Division for the Second Judicial Department has disbarred an attorney convicted of federal felony offenses On June 23, 2014, in a criminal action entitled United States v Konigsberg, commenced in the United States District Court for... [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
Konigsberg v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
Konigsberg v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Milkborne disease outbreaks by Food category, United States, 1973-2005 (source: FTCLDF via CDC). [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 4:19 am
” Konigsberg Intern. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:39 pm
" Matter of Konigsberg, 125 N.J. [read post]