Search for: "State v. LITTLE ART CORPORATION"
Results 61 - 80
of 397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Similarly, the International Corporate Accountability Roundtable has launched a separate but related project on corporate crimes that are linked to human rights abuses (see here). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
’ Art of Living Foundation v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 5:47 am
This poses little or no problem due to the inclusiveness with respect to the kind and form of works which can be protected. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:46 pm
Decides to establish an open-ended intergovernmental working group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights; whose mandate shall be to elaborate an international legally binding instrument to regulate, in international human rights law, the activities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises; 2. [read post]
29 May 2018, 11:44 am
United States (Art Lien) The Mandatory Victims Restitution Act requires courts to impose restitution for victims of a number of enumerated federal crimes. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 2:18 pm
Cont’l CanCo. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
The idea of the world beyond the walls of the space where they sleep (and perhaps eat and watch) is of little concern--as long as food and other comforts (medicines, etc.) can be counted on to be left at the bedroom door. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
Speed had little difficulty raising $25 million. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:00 am
The Supreme Court had little trouble following the statute. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
” As revised, the new novelty provision states: (a) NOVELTY; PRIOR ART. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
” As revised, the new novelty provision states: (a) NOVELTY; PRIOR ART. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 3:27 am
” As revised, the new novelty provision states: (a) NOVELTY; PRIOR ART. [read post]
26 May 2010, 5:41 pm
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:07 pm
As usual, the corporate giant won again, as the CAFC displayed divisions within. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 8:19 am
” Electronic Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
V’s constitutional amendment processes. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:24 am
Amusement Art, LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:34 pm
” Byrne v. [read post]
