Search for: "State v. LaGarde"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2014, 11:43 am
Laetitia Lagarde (Jacobacci Avvocati), Class 46 blogger and former guest Kat, is also a member of the plain packaging (PP) task force of INTA's Limits on Trademark Rights Committee. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 pm
Clause 3.2 stated they they would not publish, in any jurisdiction, any articles or statements which “refer to” Mr Mionis or his “immediate family”. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
Lagarde v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:33 pm
LaGard, Inc., 156 F.3d 1206, 1214–15 (Fed. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
Let's see what the Secretary for State says.Something to read? [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 3:57 am
After a short introduction on the stakes and the historical aspects of the law on such movements, the first day will address the principles governing those movements (Human rights, EU rights, party autonomy and the States’ interests) and day two the diverse methods, traditional or in test, to regulate them (Conflict of laws v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
* Letter from Japan 1: product placement(Almost) directly from Japan, Laetitia Lagarde pens the first of an occasional series of Japan-related blog posts. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
On Afro-IP, Caroline Ncube relates the tale of a South African wine brand dispute (Alto v Altus) which ended with Altus preferring a name change (to Fenix) to the prospect of defending a trade mark infringement claim. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:13 pm
Fourthly, in assessing the distinctive character of the mark in question the General Court distorted the relevant facts and did not sufficiently state the reasons for its judgment. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:47 pm
¶¶ 38-39 (Teva v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 12:02 pm
-Fort Worth 1970, no writ); see also State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 12:02 pm
-Fort Worth 1970, no writ); see also State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
Following Advocate General Sharpston’s opinion, the Court stated that the InfoSoc Directive, which confers a more generous protection to TPMs than the Software Directive, should govern TPMs used in videogames. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 1:07 am
In line with the above-stated quotation, they suggest a radical reorientation of choice-of-law rules. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
Some other Member States, including France and Belgium, have laws which restrict – usually to non-commercial purposes – the use of such images without prior authorisation. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
However, today's decision in Case T-526/09 PAKI Logistics GmbH v OHIM; soutenu par Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord -- available only in French and German so far -- has drummed up a lot of activity in the general vicinity of the Kat's email in-box, spearheaded by the articulate and erudite Simon Malynicz (3 New Square) who appeared for the Royaume-Uni [Merpel explains: the United Kingdom has been rebranded 'Royaume-Uni' in a desperate… [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:06 pm
The poll was inspired by the Kat's surprise at the ruling of the General Court in Case T-35/08 Codorniu Napa v OHIM - Bodegas Ontañon (ARTESA NAPA VALLEY), noted on Class 46 here by Laetitia Lagarde, that there was indeed a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
Stefano Barazza talks us through Medtronic v Mirowski in this PatLit post. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
” The case, Solid 21 Inc. v Hublot of America, et al. [read post]
