Search for: "State v. Lack"
Results 21 - 40
of 39,842
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 7:03 pm
Defendant filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
Copan Italia S.p.A. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:55 am
Juliana v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
" The issue raised on appeal is whether Supreme Court properly struck respondent's unverified answer (see Matter of Atwood v Pridgen, 142 AD3d 1278, 1279 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 945 [2016]).Petitioners failed to reject respondent's answer and deem it a nullity based upon the lack of a verification (see CPLR 3022). [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
" The issue raised on appeal is whether Supreme Court properly struck respondent's unverified answer (see Matter of Atwood v Pridgen, 142 AD3d 1278, 1279 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 945 [2016]).Petitioners failed to reject respondent's answer and deem it a nullity based upon the lack of a verification (see CPLR 3022). [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Stating that it had never directly addressed the question and citing Daimler7 and Magill v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
Are we really worried about percentage leases, or fee-sharing with law firm employees leading to lack of professional independence? [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
Therefore, in an article 78 proceeding, "as long as there was any credible evidence of lack of causation before the Board of Trustees, its determination must stand" (Matter of Giuliano v New York Fire Dept. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
Therefore, in an article 78 proceeding, "as long as there was any credible evidence of lack of causation before the Board of Trustees, its determination must stand" (Matter of Giuliano v New York Fire Dept. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:55 am
In Citizens for Clean Air & Clean Water in Brazoria County et al v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:18 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
Last year, the state court ruled in favor of the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 8:43 am
Warsame v Hounslow LBC (2000) WLR 696 on s.193(7) considered. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
Fujifilm contested, raising arguments relating to the (lacking) confidential nature of the information and proportionality (i.e. limiting access to 3 employees should be considered disproportionate). [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
This money judgment, however, only states that a party must pay a particular sum. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm
Washington, D.C. super-lawyer, Gene Schaerr, has filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:35 am
[7] Maslowski et al. v. [read post]
