Search for: "State v. Ladd"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
In relation to the evidence, Arnold LJ found that Neo’s application failed on the first criterion set out in Ladd v Marshall. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm
Sec. of State: Ditto. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 11:56 am
Robinson v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 7:21 am
But, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recently reversed (Ladd v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 10:40 am
Hence the grant of the licence in August 2018 This evidence was accepted by the UT on the Ladd v Marshall principles. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Civil Rights Law section 65 was amended to provide that any person may elect to resume the use of a former middle name upon divorce or annulment and that the state shall not impose a fee to change the middle name on a state identifying document due to a change in marital status. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 1:27 pm
Again, it falls at the first of the Ladd v Marshall fences. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 8:42 am
The FRAND element cannot be considered separately for the purpose of the forum conveniens analysis.Relevance of the new evidenceAlthough the new evidence in relation to the Chinese Court Guidelines would be admissible under the first Ladd v Marshall test (couldn't have been submitted at first instance trial) it did not meet the second criteria of having an influence on the outcome of the case. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
Sales LJ was unconvinced that the criteria set out in Ladd v Marshall [1954] EWCA Civ 1 – intended to reflect the balance of justice in relation to applications to admit fresh evidence – had not been satisfied and KV was unable to demonstrate that evidence such as Dr Cohen’s report could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence for use earlier. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am
”) State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:30 pm
I think of my executed client, Robert Ladd. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Paragraph [0003] of the Patent states that the invention is directed to chronic pain disorders. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 10:58 am
A recent case, Matter of Ladd v Krupp, 136 A.D.3d 1391 (4th Dept. 2016) decide in the fourth department has highlighted this disparity. [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
’ Ladd v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
Any consideration of whether fresh evidence should be admitted (the Ladd v Marshall test) can only be within the first stage. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:15 pm
As the Supreme Court said in Hall v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:15 pm
As the Supreme Court said in Hall v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:56 am
In delivering the lead judgment Lord Wilson stated that The Ladd criteria have no relevance to the determination of an application to set aside a financial order on grounds of fraudulent non-disclosure He reasoned that the Court of Appeal was wrong to accept an argument that the criteria should apply to determine what evidence could be adduced because they had not conducted a fact-finding exercise and the first Ladd criterion presupposes that there has been a trial… [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and related cases.[6]” The court in Ladd Furniture v. [read post]
