Search for: "State v. Lanza" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2015, 9:47 am by David Clark
Introduced by Assemblyman Phil Steck on January 15, 2015 and by State Senator Andrew Lanza on March 20, 2015, the bill (A2147/S4447) is entitled “Policy Against Restraint of Trade,” and operates from the premise that the Court of Appeals decision in BDO Seidman v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 9:47 am by David J. Clark
Introduced by Assemblyman Phil Steck on January 15, 2015 and by State Senator Andrew Lanza on March 20, 2015, the bill (A2147/S4447) is entitled “Policy Against Restraint of Trade,” and operates from the premise that the Court of Appeals decision in BDO Seidman v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:51 am
Although the reasoning is different, the result would be similar to that of the Lanza decision in the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is undisputed that the defendants failed to submit such "documentary evidence" when they filed the underlying claim in the Court of Claims and that the underlying claim was dismissed based on that pleading defect (Reed v State of New York, [*2]78 NY2d 1, 7; Gioeli v State of New York, 39 AD3d 815; Piccarreto v State of New York, 144 AD2d 920, 921; Heiss v State of New York, 143 AD2d 67, 69; Ivey v… [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:24 am by Amanda Pickens
Here is a recap of February filings: Burrell, et al. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:24 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
Here is a recap of February filings: Burrell, et al. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:24 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
Here is a recap of February filings: Burrell, et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:06 am by Allen L. Harris
Lanza, District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is undisputed that the defendants failed to submit such "documentary evidence" when they filed the underlying claim in the Court of Claims and that the underlying claim was dismissed based on that pleading defect (Reed v State of New York, [*2]78 NY2d 1, 7; Gioeli v State of New York, 39 AD3d 815; Piccarreto v State of New York, 144 AD2d 920, 921; Heiss v State of New York, 143 AD2d 67, 69; Ivey v… [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 9:51 am
This result is different from that previously reached in the United States in the case of Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The party claiming insurance coverage bears the burden of proving entitlement" (New York State Thruway Auth. v Ketco, Inc., 119 AD3d 659, 661; see National Abatement Corp. v National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The party claiming insurance coverage bears the burden of proving entitlement" (New York State Thruway Auth. v Ketco, Inc., 119 AD3d 659, 661; see National Abatement Corp. v National Union Fire Ins. [read post]