Search for: "State v. Leahy"
Results 1 - 20
of 530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2014, 10:28 am
Alschuler (University of Chicago Law School) has posted Terrible Tools for Prosecutors: Notes on Senator Leahy's Proposal to 'Fix' Skilling v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:09 am
Well, except for the fact that Illinois v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 10:52 am
For 22 years, since the money laundering statutes enactment in 1986, courts have construed "proceeds" to mean gross receipts and not net profits of illegal activity consistent with the original intent of Congress.But in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:45 am
Leahy observed that the document provides no guidance on how eligible aliens can obtain assistance, nor does it suggest the government would do anything “beyond stating that it might issue a boarding document for a flight and admit the alien to the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:03 am
United States, which held that... [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 7:46 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court issued a 7-2 decision in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:21 pm
As compared to the House bill, the Leahy bill would raise the bar on what such applications must state. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 11:23 am
Admittedly, I’m no fan of the reasoning of Camreta v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 1:15 pm
The Senators' letters were prompted by the March 2020 Allen v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
Facts of Return Mail Inc v United States Postal Service The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) established the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 9:44 pm
Patent and Trademark Office in implementing portions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act or 2012 violates the Constitution by permitting a non-Article III court to deprive patentees of property rights, in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:17 am
On Monday, June 25, 2018, the United States Supreme Court granted cert. in Helsinn Healthcare S.A., v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:52 pm
Noonan -- For most of the past decade, the Supreme Court has been marking out the metes and bounds of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's execution of the post-grant review provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, particularly with regard to inter partes reviews (see "Oil States Energy Services, LLC. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:20 am
See Shadwick v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:54 am
Although a few specialized statutes (like the FECA provision at issue in California Medical) provide for certification, the three most common examples of certifications by federal courts are: (1) certifications of questions of state law to state courts of last resort (which is irrelevant for present purposes, since Article III doesn’t bind state courts); (2) certifications of otherwise unappealable interlocutory questions under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
The court sua sponte dismissed plaintiff's qui tam false marking action for failure to state a claim following the enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:25 am
United States, Clarence Thomas, Constitutional Law, Crime, Grover Norquist, Justice Safety Valve Act, Mandatory Minimum Sentences, Mandatory Sentencing, Pat Leahy, Patrick Leahy, Politics, Rand Paul, Righteous Indignation, SCOTUS, Sentencing, Sentencing Law, Supreme Court, Tamara Tabo [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am
The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:27 am
From Leahy's website:In Bilski v. [read post]
