Search for: "State v. Levell" Results 41 - 60 of 29,574
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”)As I have written before, really smart people (including high-level campus leaders) don’t always seem to understand or embrace this crucial distinction between speaking (as is one’s right) and drowning out others who have reserved a place for their own speech. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:12 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Almost a decade on, there are still very few cases that interpret those state-level changes as differing in any meaningful way from the federal standards. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:03 pm by Marcel Pemsel
However, the low distinctiveness of the word elements caused the General Court to hold that the conceptual similarity has a very limited impact on the likelihood of confusion without stating the level of conceptual similarity. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Specifically, the SPA states that there were two classes of shares: voting shares and non-voting shares. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 4:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The Court’s opinion in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]