Search for: "State v. Lilly"
Results 301 - 320
of 920
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2013, 9:35 pm
BioDelivery Sciences Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 119 F.3d 1559, 1568 (Fed. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 8:43 am
" Datatern, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:20 am
So why did Arthur Lewis win, while Lilly Ledbetter lost? [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 7:59 am
Lilly Ledbetter Senate Passes Ledbetter Bill! [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 12:44 am
Integra and patents on research tools -->In Classen Immunotherapies v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am
Eli Lilly and CompanyCase number: 12-cv-2045 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia)Case filed: December 20, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: January 2, 2013 02/08/2013 05/09/2013 2013-13 SEC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 4:18 am
The Doctrine of Res Judicata bars relitigating the same issues earlier decided by another tribunalMatter of Finkel v New York City Housing Authority, 2011 NY Slip Op 07914, Appellate Division, First Department Affirming State Supreme Court’s dismissing Finkel’s Article 78 proceeding seeking to annul a 2010 New York State Division of Human Rights' determination dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction, the Appellate Division said that the complaint… [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:21 am
However, whichever way the learned judges decide, it seems certain that “in accordance with the principles set out in Eli Lilly v Actavis” will soon be a recurring phrase for UK patent litigators when setting out their arguments on claim construction. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:09 am
Eli Lilly and Company v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Do Italians really got what sharing services among EU Member States is about, she wonders? [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 8:02 am
Baude, et al. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:45 pm
In Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 12:21 pm
Lilly v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:40 am
Title I and Title V of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 both prohibit employment discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in the private sector, local, state and federal governments. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 10:08 am
The opinion was issued in September of 2013, in the case styled Schaffer v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 8:18 am
And in Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 4:46 am
By Dennis Crouch Briefing continues in the en banc appeal of TheraSense (Abbott) v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 6:10 pm
Highlights this week included: CAFC: Disclosure that merely allows PHOSITA to ‘envision’ the claimed invention fails written description: Goeddel v Sugano (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) Evista (Raloxifene) – US: CAFC upholds decision against Teva: Eli Lilly & Co v Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc (Patent Docs) (The IP Factor) Aranesp (Darbepoetin) – EU: ECJ says ‘no’ to Kirin Amgen,… [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 7:21 pm
Moreover, the justification for limiting Foster’s rule to contractual claims remains unclear: in Jonathan Ang Phang JCA cited the English High Court’s decision in Lilly Icos LLC v 8PM Chemists Ltd [2010] FSR 4 for it, but there that proposition was simply accepted without argument (Lilly Icos, [266]). [read post]
