Search for: "State v. Loehr" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2008, 11:20 am
Sanctions ordered after lawsuit filed pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law ruled frivolousMatter of Fenstermaker v Edgemont Union Free School Dist., 2006 NY Slip Op 52652(U), Decided on September 26, 2006, Supreme Court, Westchester County, Loehr, J. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 7:30 am by FM Librarian
Yale-Loehr," Forbes, 27 June 2018 [text via LexisNexis]US Supreme Court Disregards Trump’s Discriminatory Words to Uphold Travel Ban (Human Rights Watch, June 2018) [text]Related post:- Regional Focus: United States - Pt. 1 (4 July 2018)Tagged Publications. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:59 am
Determining General Municipal Law Section 207-a benefits to be paid the individual after he or she retiresGresis v Fairview Fire District, Supreme Court, Justice Loehr, 15 Misc.3d 209 James J. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 6:08 am
Vaskas said his first lawyer had not shared the report with him and fired Loehrs without consulting him. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:48 am
Moreover, a statute must be construed as a whole reading the various sections together to determine legislative intent (Matter of Plastic Surgery Group, P.C. v Comptroller of the State of NY, 34 NY3d 507, 516 [2019]; Loehr v New York State Unified Court System, 150 AD3d 716 [2d Dept 2017]). [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:48 am
Moreover, a statute must be construed as a whole reading the various sections together to determine legislative intent (Matter of Plastic Surgery Group, P.C. v Comptroller of the State of NY, 34 NY3d 507, 516 [2019]; Loehr v New York State Unified Court System, 150 AD3d 716 [2d Dept 2017]). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Loehr and certain of sitting Justices [Justices] were informed of their need to comply with the new policy and that approval for certification would therefore be conditioned on such compliance. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 6:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
By decision and order on motion of this Court dated June 2, 2021, the respondent was immediately suspended from the practice of law in the State of New York, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.9(a)(2) and (5), and the matter was referred to the Honorable Sondra M. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:54 am by Susan Brenner
The defendant also stated that he was the only person in the home to use that particular computer. [read post]