Search for: "State v. Lord" Results 121 - 140 of 4,019
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2023, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Last week, federal district courts in three states handed down decisions in cases in which a former employee was suing his or her employer for refusing to provide them with a religious exemption from the employer's Covid vaccine mandate.In Crocker v. [read post]
The FCA has stated that serious breaches will be prioritised and that it will act “swiftly and assertively” where necessary. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
“ Reforming the law on cohabitation The Chair of the Commons Women and Equalities Committee has written to Lord Bellamy KC, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice calling on the Government to improve protections for cohabitants in England and Wales in the event of relationship breakdown or the death of a partner. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am by CMS
Since, however, this court is bound by Novo, it is for the Supreme Court to decide whether to depart from the law as stated by Lord Dyson in that case”. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:48 am by Emma Kent
Munby P states that: “Where two parents share parental responsibility, it will be the duty of one parent to ensure that the rights of the other parent are respected, and vice versa, for the benefit of the child” In Re B (A Child) [2008] UKHL 35, the House of Lords emphasized the importance of maintaining a child’s relationship with both parents unless there is a genuine risk of harm. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:09 am by Matrix Law
Ltd v Babco Forwarding & Shipping (UK) Ltd. [1978] AC 141 (“Buchanan”), the House of Lords decided by a 3:2 majority that the broad interpretation should be adopted. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 2:37 am by laura
Munby P states that: “Where two parents share parental responsibility, it will be the duty of one parent to ensure that the rights of the other parent are respected, and vice versa, for the benefit of the child” In Re B (A Child) [2008] UKHL 35, the House of Lords emphasized the importance of maintaining a child’s relationship with both parents unless there is a genuine risk of harm. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am by Matrix Law
The Court will determine whether the Supreme Court should depart from the judgment of the House of Lords in James Buchanan & Co. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
” Existing industry players, such as Rupert Murdoch, Lord Rothermere and Alex Springer have been touted as potential buyers, as well as sovereign wealth funds in Gulf States, such as Saudi Arabia. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:05 am by Yvonne Dutton
For the first time in the ICC’s history, in September 2019 a Pre-Trial Chamber recognized charges of gender persecution in Prosecutor v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am by INFORRM
The House of Lords clarified the “serious harm” test for defamation claims, stating that the claimant must prove that the publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to their reputation. [read post]
28 May 2023, 12:15 am by Frank Cranmer
However, I understand the confusion and I thank the noble Lords who have raised these amendments. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:00 pm
In simple terms, the government cannot take your land and then decide later what to do with it without running afoul of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment.Absent “urban blight,” or other exceptions which weren’t present here, the AD4 annulled the Town’s efforts to acquire the Mall property and awarded the owner its fees and costs.Not that’s a condemnation if… [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  He explains that “growing up in New Haven, I never felt coerced, but nevertheless, I did not like it when we recited the Lord’s Prayer, Protestant version, in all these local elementary schools, which were loaded with Irish Catholic kids” (OI, v.2, 331). [read post]