Search for: "State v. Lozada"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2021, 4:34 am
Accepting plaintiff’s averments and allegations as true (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; Berry v Ambulance Serv. of Fulton County, Inc., 39 AD3d 1123, 1124 [2007]) and inasmuch as the documentary evidence submitted by defendant does not conclusively refute them (see New York State Workers’ Compensation Bd. v Program Risk Mgt., Inc., 150 AD3d 1589, 1594 [2017]), Supreme Court correctly denied that part of the motion seeking dismissal… [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
Luís Lozada and Jared Ham preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am
First up is United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
Lozada preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:07 am
First up is Dawson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:13 am
Luis Lozada and Tyler Schmitt have a preview at Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am
First up is Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:11 am
Lauren Devendorf and Luis Lozada preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
[FN2] Given the [*3]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am
[FN2] Given the [*3]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am
Given the [*2]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Determining if a complaint alleging sexual harassment based a claim of a continuing violation of New York State's Human Rights Law is timelyLozada v Elmont Hook & Ladder Co. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:17 pm
The petition of the day is: Sanchez de Lozada v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Ene v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 8:13 am
Lozada v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 2:47 pm
Lozada v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 2:47 pm
Lozada v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 7:41 am
”); see also Lozada v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:48 pm
Div. 1992); Lozada v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 3:15 am
A civil suit captioned Mamani v. [read post]
