Search for: "State v. Macy"
Results 61 - 80
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2016, 12:10 pm
Garrett's cell phone "the police found text messages discussing the sale of a $300 Macy’s gift card for cash or drugs. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:29 pm
Panel on “fluid,” legacy & heritage marks – @MariaBaratta discussing Macy’s v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:58 am
See, e.g., Macy v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:14 am
In Macy v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 2:08 pm
In the United States Supreme Court decision entitled,What Are the Leading Cases From the U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:06 am
While the groundbreaking decision in Fabian v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:39 am
This guy was convicted in state court of robbery in Macy's. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:57 am
Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that found former members of the landmark Dukes v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 3:52 pm
In 2012, it similarly found in Macy v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 10:02 am
A 2012 decision, Macy v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
As you may recall in 2012, the EEOC in Macy v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
As discussed in more detail here, the EEOC concluded in Macy v. [read post]
Transgender worker’s lack of exhaustion won’t necessarily bar sex bias, reprisal claim against union
23 Jun 2015, 7:49 am
” Pre-Macy futility. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:39 pm
Further, state laws on bathroom access for transgender workers vary. [read post]
25 May 2015, 11:12 am
Macy’s West Stores, Inc. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:23 am
Since we last reported on the 2012 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) decision in Macy v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:46 am
[Houghton Miflin v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
In a footnote, the directive notes – citing the EEOC’s 2012 decision in Macy v Holder (CCH Employment Practices Guide ¶6881) as well as other EEOC and federal circuit court decisions – that although sexual orientation and gender identity are not explicitly protected by Title VII, the “EEOC and private litigants continue to develop sex discrimination theory. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm
Implications for Employers The theories of liability articulated by the EEOC in this case closely follow the EEOC’s prior landmark administrative ruling titled Macy v. [read post]
