Search for: "State v. Magness" Results 101 - 120 of 225
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2011, 8:53 pm by Allie
  I guess I assumed that celebs were far too busy to worry about silly stories in the gossip mags, but just yesterday I read about Katie Holmes vs. [read post]
3 May 2016, 4:12 am by SHG
This goes to the same trade-off reflected by the U.S. v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 9:36 am
(gastoniafamilylaw.com)MAG: Ryan Reynolds Annulling Scarlett Johansson Marriage To Wed Blake Lively (gossipcop.com)Kim Kardashian & Kris Humphries: Are Annulment Rumors Hogwash? [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 2:12 pm
The pleaded case of R v Mondelly v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2006] EWHC 2370 (Admin) apparently concerned a prosecution in clear breach of an established and stated policy on trading standards cases, but actually addressed the lawfulness of a caution which would prevent proceedings in a court, rather than the power of a court to terminate as an abuse of process a prosecution. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm by Jennifer Ko
Supreme Court decisions: Hughes v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
As the CJEU’s case law proves, such requirement applies to any kind of trade mark which is indistinguishable from the appearance of the products, be it a three-dimensional trade mark [Procter & Gamble v OHIM, Joined Cases C-473/01 P and C-474/01 P; Mag Instrument v OHIM, Case C-136/02 P and Deutsche SiSi-Werke v OHIM, Case C-173/04 P), a figurative trade mark consisting of a two-dimensional… [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
In Novartis v EUIPO, T‑678/15 and T‑679/15 the GC had established that a sign which departs significantly from the norm or customs of the sector is capable of being distinctive.The GC disagreed.The sign was not likely to be perceived as representing the letter ‘v’ of the word ‘vericiguat’. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
Maya Mags., Inc., 688 F.3d 1164, 1171 (9th Cir. 2012); Barton Beebe, An Empirical Study of U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
District Court, District of New Jersey, No. 11-mag-04022. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
 . to comply with state law while also being in compliance with federal law”); Strayhorn v. [read post]