Search for: "State v. Maker" Results 201 - 220 of 4,686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2010, 3:14 am by Bob Kraft
” The National Law Journal (10/13, Mauro) reports that David Frederick, a partner at Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, is representing the family of Hannah Bruesewitz in the case, Bruesewitz v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 10:58 am by Jordan Schneider
v=qV6Wc_f1Cgo&t=195s I HAVE CHINATALK NEWSLETTER WHICH YOU SHOULD ALL SIGN UP TO READ! [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Tucker served as lead counsel in both Glucksberg v Washington and Quill v NY, which raised federal constitutional claims seeking to establish the right; both cases were heard by the Supreme Court of the United States in the mid-1990s. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:31 am
David Frederick began arguments for the state of Maine with a lengthy exchange with the Chief Justice and Justice Alito, both of whom were hard pressed to find a distinction between this case and Riegal v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 9:12 am by Joe Mullin
Washington State Attorney General Press Release State of Washington v. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 12:41 am by Bona Law PC
Bona Law also filed an amicus brief in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 1:52 pm by Giles Peaker
RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2019) UKSC 52 The question of the powers of the First Tier and Upper Tribunals (and indeed initial decision makers) to disapply secondary legislation where there is a breach of the appellant’s human rights has reached the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:23 pm by James Yang
  Instead, Keurig accused Sturm of facilitating infringement by the end user of the method patents in Keurig v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
 The owner stated, “It wastes time to fight back. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:42 am by SW
  Guidance can be issued from a public body that is not the decision maker in a specific case. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:58 am
The bill would permit individuals to sue device makers under state tort laws, and permit state court juries to second-guess the expert decisions of federal regulators. [read post]