Search for: "State v. Mellor"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2021, 12:04 am
"Disclosure" means stating whether a document exists or has [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 12:19 am
Mellor State of Oklahoma v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 8:44 pm
Mellors, et al., and is [...] [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am
Mr Justice Mellor dismissed the application "with some regret". [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am
On 16 March 2023, the High Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment following the FRAND trial in InterDigital v Lenovo. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 6:13 am
In his recent January 11, 2012 decision in the case of Mellor v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 12:35 pm
A regional database for copyright and related rights for ARIPO and the ARIPO Member States will also be established. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am
On 16 March 2022, the High Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment following the FRAND trial in InterDigital v Lenovo. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
The rate of $0.175 ordered by Mellor J was close to Lenovo’s case of $0.016. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:29 am
(Rev 3) [2012] EWCA Crim 1456 (04 July 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Secretary of State for Home Department v AM [2012] EWHC 1854 (Admin) (06 July 2012) The College of Naturopathic Medicine Ltd (CNM), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) [2012] EWHC 1851 (Admin) (05 July 2012) FGP v Serco Plc & Anor [2012] EWHC 1804 (Admin) (05 July 2012) High Court (Commercial Court) Sibir Energy Ltd v… [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:16 am
After Neurim v Mylan [2021] EWHC 2198 (Pat) and Abbott v Dexcom [2021] EWHC 2246 (Pat) (see IPKat article here), Mr Justice Mellor handed his third judgment in a month regarding expedition in Article on Advanced Bionics v Med-El [2021] EWHC 2415 (Pat). [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 7:21 am
Mellor, 233 U.S. 718 (1914). [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am
Similarly, Hacon HHJ stated in Teva v Novartis [2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat): “It seems that there was little or no interaction between Novartis’ three experts during the preparation of their evidence. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am
Doubt was cast upon this practice in early 2021 in a CMC in Sandoz v BMS[7][2021] EWHC 393 (Pat) (Ch) and Teva v BMS where Mellor J observed that the practice of listing the trial before the CMC might well be doing things the wrong way round , and lead to parties jumping the queue to get their trial listed whilst others completed their pre-CMC formalities. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
These are both matters upon which Mr Mellor has placed particular reliance but I do not believe they take him very far. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 8:43 pm
We're very close now to the InterDigital v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 3:50 pm
In essence, that would be to undo virtually the entire modern “regulatory state. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:24 am
On the issue of her veganism as a protected characteristic, Employment Judge Mellor distinguished the application from the facts in Mr J Casamitjana Costa v The League Against Cruel Sports [2020] UKET 3331129/2018. [read post]
