Search for: "State v. Mellor" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The rate of $0.175 ordered by Mellor J was close to Lenovo’s case of $0.016. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am by David Hemming (Bristows)
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:24 am by Frank Cranmer
On the issue of her veganism as a protected characteristic, Employment Judge Mellor distinguished the application from the facts in Mr J Casamitjana Costa v The League Against Cruel Sports [2020] UKET 3331129/2018. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:56 am by Florian Mueller
As for the value of "the patent's inclusion in the standard," it's worth nothing that even Justice Mellor's InterDigital v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Similarly, Hacon HHJ stated in Teva v Novartis [2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat): “It seems that there was little or no interaction between Novartis’ three experts during the preparation of their evidence. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am by Nicholas Round (Bristows)
On 16 March 2023, the High Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment following the FRAND trial in InterDigital v Lenovo. [read post]
On 16 March 2022, the High Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment following the FRAND trial in InterDigital v Lenovo. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am by Eleonora Rosati
He went on to find that earlier pages in the sales process, including the full product details page, also targeted the UK, not least because that page stated “This item ships to the United Kingdom”. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 12:04 am
  "Disclosure" means stating whether a document exists or has [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:16 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  After Neurim v Mylan [2021] EWHC 2198 (Pat) and Abbott v Dexcom [2021] EWHC 2246 (Pat) (see IPKat article here), Mr Justice Mellor handed his third judgment in a month regarding expedition in Article on Advanced Bionics v Med-El [2021] EWHC 2415 (Pat). [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 12:35 pm by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
A regional database for copyright and related rights for ARIPO and the ARIPO Member States will also be established. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:32 am by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, a thought leader on FRAND since his landmark Microsoft v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Doubt was cast upon this practice in early 2021 in a CMC in Sandoz v BMS[7][2021] EWHC 393 (Pat) (Ch) and Teva v BMS where Mellor J observed that the practice of listing the trial before the CMC might well be doing things the wrong way round , and lead to parties jumping the queue to get their trial listed whilst others completed their pre-CMC formalities. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am by Nicolas Round (Bristows)
The judge began with a broad definition: Stated generally the law is clear that patents are directed to those likely to have a real and practical interest in the subject matter of the invention[2]. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
After you graduated from law school in ’91, you signed on with another brand-new libertarian outfit: Chip Mellor and Clint Bolick’s Institute for Justice, where you’ve worked ever since. [read post]