Search for: "State v. Mowry" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Mowry received a letter from the New York State and Local Employees’ Retirement System [ERS] informing him that, based upon a review of his relationship with both the school district and the Village, he had incorrectly been reported as an employee rather than as an independent contractor. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Addressing Petitioner argument that he was erroneously directed to repay the pension benefits mistakenly paid to him, the court said that the Comptroller "had no choice but to seek recoupment of such benefits, as the Comptroller has a duty to correct errors in order to ensure the integrity of the public retirement system", citing Matter of Mowry v DiNapoli, 111 AD3d 1117. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 10:50 am by Dennis Crouch
Both the District Court and the Supreme Court cite to Mowry v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division explained that it had recently said that “[w]here professional services are involved, the absence of direct control is not dispositive of the existence of an employer-employee relationship," citing Mowry v DiNapoli, 111 AD3d 1117. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:32 am by Shaun McParland Baldwin
   The Stevenson court relied upon and cited to the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision in Mowry v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rather, said the court, "[T]he Comptroller is statutorily required to correct errors in the retirement benefits records and adjust payments accordingly to ensure the integrity of the public retirement system,"** citing Matter of Mowry v DiNapoli, 111 AD3d 1117 and RSSL §111 [c]). [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rather, said the court, "[T]he Comptroller is statutorily required to correct errors in the retirement benefits records and adjust payments accordingly to ensure the integrity of the public retirement system,"** citing Matter of Mowry v DiNapoli, 111 AD3d 1117 and RSSL §111 [c]). [read post]