Search for: "State v. Nettles"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2017, 4:18 am
They are primarily operated and developed on a state-by-state bar association basis. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 9:13 am
However, as also quoted earlier, in Hardin, decided only a month after Nettles, our court, after quoting the preceding language from Nettles, omitted "manifest injustice", stating that the exception to our former rule was "a plain error review". 678 F.2d at 591 (emphasis added). [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
The unanimity of the justices was matched, to an unusual degree, by unanimity among the States and Central government (appearing as interveners in the hearing), whose Solicitors-General ‘grasped the nettle and decided to present a united front’ in seeking a new approach.[2]The decision itself drew upon both existing disenchantment with orthodoxy (or the lack of any accepted interpretation) and upon scholarly critiques, particularly those of Michael Coper (who appeared… [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 10:54 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting sort of en banc, decided Nettles v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 2:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
That discussion is as possible within non-state governance units as it is within states. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
Globalization has opened holes in the walls that used to serve to police and protect states and their power authority. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:51 am
Case Information: Amo, LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 2:55 pm
In Rahofy v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
The court rejected the “bold” submission, stating that there was no precedent anywhere in the world and such socially controversial changes were only for Parliament. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:11 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts: British Columbia Supreme Court grasps the nettle in right to die case Toppled, choked, locked-in: where are human rights when you need them? [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:36 am
(citing Nettles v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:51 am
“The state’s broke. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
Perez (11-713), on redistricting the state house, Perry v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:38 am
"The Garner Transcripts: That v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Surprisingly this nettle has only really been grasped once before, by the House of Lords seven years ago in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, where the question whether the abuse of process in getting the defendant deported from Zimbabwe to trial in the UK rendered his conviction so unsafe as to qualify him for compensation for miscarriage of justice. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
Its formal first reading was on 26 May 2010 and its second reading on 9 July 2010: In response to the Bill, the new Government stated a commitment to bring forward its own proposals. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
It was entitled: Grasping the nettle: obtaining a protection order.Here is the paper:GRASPING THE NETTLE: OBTAINING A PROTECTION ORDER Presentation to Australia’s CEO Challenge 4 May, 20101. [read post]
