Search for: "State v. Nicholson"
Results 61 - 80
of 233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2018, 11:35 pm
Contents include: Eirik Bjorge & Cameron Miles, Introduction William S Dodge, The Charming Betsy and The Paquete Habana (1804 and 1900) Michael Waibel, Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions (Greece v Great Britain) (1924–27) Chester Brown, Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland) (1927–28) Douglas Guilfoyle, SS Lotus (France v Turkey) (1927) Eirik Bjorge, Island of Palmas (Netherlands v United States of America) (1928) Rolf… [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 2:04 am
In concluding that Kogan had not sufficiently contributed to the screenplay [para 85], even by adding to the first three drafts, Hacon J considered the following points and authorities: Adding elements not themselves covered by copyright, such as scenic effects, is not a sufficient contribution (as per Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503)Providing helpful criticism and expert feedback on the work is not a sufficient contribution (as per Wiseman v George Weidenfeld &… [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
That decision came in June of 2015, with the ruling in California Building Industry Association (CBIA) v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
That decision came in June of 2015, with the ruling in California Building Industry Association (CBIA) v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:00 am
Nicholson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:21 pm
V. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:21 pm
V. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am
While Rose J in Secretary of State for Defence v Nicholas [2015] EWHC 4064 (Ch) (our note) had set aside a writ at least partly on the basis that notice of the application under CPR 83.13(8)(a) had not been given, Nicholson could be distinguished from the present case as in this case, in addition to the knowledge the Appellant gained from his active participation in all proceedings up to the conclusion of the hearing before HHJ Harris, there was at the very least… [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am
While Rose J in Secretary of State for Defence v Nicholas [2015] EWHC 4064 (Ch) (our note) had set aside a writ at least partly on the basis that notice of the application under CPR 83.13(8)(a) had not been given, Nicholson could be distinguished from the present case as in this case, in addition to the knowledge the Appellant gained from his active participation in all proceedings up to the conclusion of the hearing before HHJ Harris, there was at the very least… [read post]
9 May 2017, 10:56 am
Lawfare liveblogged both yesterday’s oral argument in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 8:38 am
Nicholson, 19 Vet. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 8:38 am
Nicholson, 19 Vet. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 7:09 am
Nicholson, 400 F.3d1375, 1380 (Fed. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:35 am
And in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm
United States, 519U.S. 172, 183 n.7 (1997); United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm
Nicholson, 20 Vet. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm
Nicholson, 20 Vet. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am
Ben reviewed the two big questions at issue in Washington v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am
Carrie Cordero outlined a few quick thoughts on making national security arguments in court based on Washington v. [read post]
