Search for: "State v. Pare"
Results 1 - 20
of 239
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2013, 9:32 am
” (citingGraham v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:13 am
Gross negligence, as both parties state, is “conduct that evinces a reckless disregard for the rights of others or ‘smacks’ of intentional wrongdoing,” (Sommer v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
A recent New York Times article reports that prosecutors in such states as New Jersey are paring down their reliance on civilian witnesses, to reduce obligations to protect witnesses in a climate where the police often are unable to protect witnesses' safety. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:07 pm
A little while back, I was considering whether to undertake an empirical study into whether law enforcement officers were relying on the inventory-search exception to the warrant requirement more often after the United States Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Arizona v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:25 pm
Jennings v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
From today’s Washington Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:46 pm
That case, Skilling v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
In Beck v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:35 pm
’” The case cite is Experience Hendrix, L.L.C. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:34 am
Howard Marshall to the endless litigation (the fictional Jarndyce v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:11 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:54 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In Florence v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 5:54 am
In The Myth of Morrison: Securities Fraud Litigation Against Foreign Issuers, we examine the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 12:44 pm
Shannon Lumber v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:07 am
The case, Riley v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
In Sines v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:28 am
Various congressional proposals seek to pare back this assertion of state tax authority. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
That is so, because adjudication of those claims and the Government’s defenses thereto would require disclosure of national-security information subject to the DNI’s assertion of the state secrets privilege.So said the government (ours) Monday in Jewel v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:16 am
This is an important question of state law, as deference can allow an agency to win even when its legal position is not the best interpretation of the law.[1] Over the past decade, state legislatures,[2] state courts,[3] and the public[4] have begun to grow wary of the power that deference cedes to state agencies and have started to pare it back. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:24 pm
The government has filed its reply in support of its July motion for a stay pending appeal in Hatim v. [read post]
